May 20, 2004

Life, Truth, and a Confession

Lots of stuff to chat about today.


  • Good discussion at Critical Mass about the decision to go to grad or law school, protracted adolescence, life, the universe, and everything. I took a couple of years off before grad school, and I think that those years probably contributed to my decision not to get the PhD. There's nothing like the real world to finely calibrate the BS detector and give you a little perspective.
  • I was watching the Angel finale last night--liked it, for the most part--and the ubiquitous Truth.com commercial came on. Apparently the folks at Truth.com are no longer satisfied with pointing out that cigarettes can kill you because they contain nasty chemicals. Nope, now they have a whole commercial about how cigarettes can kill you because they are hot and can BURN YOUR HOUSE DOWN! OMGWTFBBQ3l3v3n!!!!!111!!! The evil cigarette companies aren't pursuing some sort of flame retardant safety cigarette technology which probably costs a whole lot of money to produce--money which is probably in short supply thanks to lawsuits and the efforts of organizations like Truth.com. They're EVIL! It's an EPIDEMIC! They must BE STOPPED! Reaching much, Truth.com? What next, cigarette companies come to your house in the dark of night and steal kittens for use in occult blood rituals? Shut up, Truth.com. Seriously.
  • Since we're on the topic of consipiracy theories, I'm sure you'll be gratified to know that the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy has finally been revealed. The truth is out there, people. Praise the Lord and pass me a kitten. Yes, I secretly work for Big Tobacco, we are trying to burn down your homes and ruin your lives, and it's all possible through the power of kitten blood! Mu-ha-ha!

And finally, I realize I may be stripped of my North Carolina citizenship for this, but I have a confession to make: I hate Carl Sandburg. I hate his cutesy, self-consciously folksy writing, I hate his stupid made up words like "slimpsing" and his ridiculous sentence constructions ("chubbed their chubs" indeed), and I hate the fact that his family bought a lovely antebellum farm house and proceeded to furnish it with milk crates. I have a firey, burning hate for Carl Sandburg, and I've been carrying this burden with me far too long.

That said, I will probably be reading his stupid story about the stupid rag doll and the stupid broom handle and their stupid weddding procession and who was in it to The Boy again tonight, and I will be forced to give voice to this hateful man's horrible made up words and twee style. Gah! Gah, Gah, Gah!

"But he's Carl Sandburg!" you will say. "He's a folksy treasure!" you will say. "He's salt of the earth and the kids love his Rootabaga Stories!" you will say. To which I reply, "Bah!" Kids also like to put buckets on their heads, sand down their pants, and ketchup on their garden peas. They are hardly arbiters of taste.

You are the bane of my nightly existence, Carl Sandburg. A pox on you! And a lesser pox on my mom, who bought the stupid book.

Posted by Big Arm Woman at May 20, 2004 08:34 AM
Comments

Two words: Harry Potter.

Posted by: Lex at May 20, 2004 09:36 AM

I rebelled against him as a kid. I called him Carl Sandbag and started to hate rutabagas (no, really) on the power of those smarmy stories.

I've got my taste for rutabagas back, but I'd still rather read a sandbag than Sandburg.

Posted by: meg at May 20, 2004 10:43 AM

Hah! You think that's bad. Try having been born in Galesburg and sharing your feelings about Ol' Carl. And living in Chicago most of your life and cringing whenever the fog. . . you get the idea. Gives me the grues, he does.

Posted by: Captain Yips at May 20, 2004 11:32 AM

At least we none of us live in Winesburg, Ohio (to conflate a buncha burgs). That would turn one off of all 20th-century literature.

Posted by: meg at May 20, 2004 12:26 PM

Meg -

I have never met anyone who has actually eaten a rutabaga. As a child, I thought they were a fictional food.

But it is pleasing to see that others share my Sandburg-hate.

Posted by: BAW at May 20, 2004 12:40 PM

If you've seen The Insider or read anything by Jeff Wigand, I'm not sure how you can think of tobacco companies as anything but evil.
Anyway the technology to make cigarettes fire safe has been around for a very long time, long before the well-deserved lawsuits against the industry began. Moreover, the cigarette companies' arguments against fire-safe arguments don't hold water. See:
http://www.jeffreywigand.com/insider/moakley.html

Posted by: Chris Martin at May 20, 2004 01:06 PM

Chris -

Not championing tobacco companies here--grew up in Winston-Salem. But a whole commercial the gist of which is that cigarettes are bad because they can BURN DOWN YOUR HOUSE!!!!! just tickles my funnybone. Cigarettes are bad because smoking them fills you with chemicals that cause cancer and a host of other diseases. Burning down the house by accident, while bad, is not a hazard specific to tobacco.

It's like the fact that they're dangerous and addictive is no longer bad enough, and people won't be swayed not to smoke unless we point out that they'll ALSO destroy your property!

Sort of like saying that it's not dangerous enough to point a loaded gun at someone and pull the trigger, but the gun could also get dropped on your foot and break a bone! So don't buy a gun! Eeek!

Posted by: BAW at May 20, 2004 02:01 PM

It's true that the most delightful thing about rutabagas is their name. Why call them swedes when you've got access to lovely rrrooootabayyyyyga? But I'm a lover of root vegetables -- neeps (pars- and turn-), tatties, and all. Well, except for beets, which taste like just-mined magnesium to me. Or is it uranium, I forget.

Frivolity aside, are we destined to find our state authors tiresome? I certainly had to leave Tennessee to appreciate James Agee. And no distance from Georgia will endear Sidney Lanier to my heart.

Or maybe it's just the South. I don't have problems with California's many authors (although those auteurs are another thing).

Posted by: meg at May 20, 2004 03:08 PM

The Truth.com commercials always make me want to start smoking just to spite the preachy, smarmy assholes.

No shit. I mean, really. Smoke, in your lungs, bad for you? Well, no WAY, dudes. Thanks for that tip, I never might have had that insight if not for your heavy-handed propaganda campaign. Thanks again.

Bastards.

Posted by: Sigivald at May 20, 2004 03:51 PM

What I feel for Mr. Sandburg just might be worse than hate; complete and utter indifference.

Posted by: jim at May 21, 2004 12:22 AM

Well there's a fallacy that goes we shouldn't worry about x because y is a worse problem. The more important question is how severe of a problem x is. I'd think it would be pretty silly to worry about cigarette fires if only about a dozen people were killed every year but they actually cause 1000 deaths and 3000 injuries each year according to NFPA. As the ignition source in fires, they're the largest single cause of deaths.

Posted by: Chris Martin at May 21, 2004 10:50 AM

Hang in there - in a couple of years your child will be old enough for The Jungle Books. Oh best beloved.

Posted by: Laura at May 21, 2004 11:45 PM

Heck, I meant The Just-So Stories. My brain has rotted.

Posted by: Laura at May 21, 2004 11:46 PM

I thought of you, BAW, when I heard some politician on the radio (National Pinko Radio, of course -- and I'm a pround pinko) fulminating about how we need to give an R rating to all movies in which a character smokes, unless that character contracts lung cancer onscreen. He insists that 200,000 innocent children will be saved from the grips of the demon weed per year.

Frankly, the fulminating against the other demon weed is more entertaining. *Cheroot Madness* is never going to beat out *Reefer Madness* in a cult-movie face-off.

Posted by: meg at May 23, 2004 08:07 PM

I have to chime in with the cigarette smoke burning down houses is bad crowd -- when I was a kid, my neighbors' house burned down, killing all three of the kids in it (though not the parents, who managed to get out) -- cause of the fire being the cigarettes the mom had dumped from the ashtray before she went to bed.

I mean, yeah, it's nasty that they give people lung cancer. It's also sort of bad that they burn people alive in their beds. I don't see how that's going overboard with the truth, exactly.

Posted by: delagar at May 25, 2004 09:27 AM